Home › RF Design Tools › Transmission Lines › Grounded CPW
RF DESIGN TOOL · TRANSMISSION LINE

Grounded Coplanar Waveguide (GCPW) Calculator

Grounded CPW puts ground copper on both sides of the signal trace on the same layer, plus a solid ground plane underneath, stitched together with vias. It offers good isolation and low radiation — the most common routing for RF modules, antenna feeds and dense boards.

Analyze W → ZoSynthesize Zo → gap WConformal mappingMultilayer friendlyAntenna feeds

① Inputs

A. Analyze: known size → impedance

B. Synthesize: known impedance → size

② Results

ItemValue
Characteristic impedance ZoΩ
Synthesized gap Wmm
Effective permittivity εeff
Velocity factor k = 1/√εeff
Quarter wavelength λ/4 (guided)mm

Cross-section

WSWεrhGround planeCoplanar groundSignal conductor← Ground via
Signal conductorGroundDielectric

Symbols vs inputs: Relative permittivity εr Center width S Substrate height h Gap W

Impedance vs dimension (other inputs fixed)

Common laminates εr (click to apply)

Materialεr
FR-4
Low-cost general PCB laminate; higher loss above 1 GHz, εr varies with frequency and lot
4.3–4.6
Rogers RO4003C
Hydrocarbon ceramic laminate, FR-4-compatible processing
3.38 (design 3.55)
Rogers RO4350B
Common for power amplifiers, antennas and 5–6 GHz circuits
3.48 (design 3.66)
Rogers RO3003
PTFE ceramic, low loss and stable εr for mmWave
3.00
RT/duroid 5880
PTFE glass, very low loss, wider lines
2.20
RO3010 / RT6010
High permittivity for compact circuits
10.2
Alumina Al₂O₃
Thin/thick-film microwave substrate
≈ 9.8

What is grounded coplanar waveguide (GCPW / CPWG)?

Grounded coplanar waveguide, also written CPWG or conductor-backed CPW, is a coplanar waveguide with an additional ground plane under the substrate. The signal trace (width S) is flanked by top-layer ground copper at gap W, and the top grounds are stitched to the bottom ground with rows of vias. Field lines end on both the side grounds and the backside plane, so GCPW radiates less and couples less to neighbouring traces than microstrip, and its impedance can be adjusted with the gap as well as the trace width.

That is why RF modules, antenna feeds and compact wireless designs on FR-4 commonly route 50 Ω lines as GCPW. When the gap W becomes large compared with the substrate height h, the side grounds have little effect and the result approaches microstrip; without the backside ground it becomes ordinary CPW. This calculator uses conformal mapping and assumes zero-thickness copper, so leave margin for copper thickness and solder mask on small gaps, and keep via spacing well below a tenth of a wavelength.

How to use

  1. Enter laminate εr and substrate height h (dielectric from the signal layer to the backside ground).
  2. Enter the center conductor width S and frequency f. Note: here S is the trace width and W is the gap (some tools swap the symbols).
  3. Known gap: enter W and press Analyze to get Zo.
  4. Known target: enter Zo and press Synthesize to find the gap W with S and h fixed.

Theory and formulas

Conformal mapping gives the capacitance of the upper half-space and the dielectric layer. K(k) is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, k′ = √(1 − k²):

k = S / (S + 2W)
k1 = tanh(πS / 4h) / tanh(π(S + 2W) / 4h)
q = [ K(k1)/K(k1′) ] / [ K(k)/K(k′) ]
εeff = (1 + εr · q) / (1 + q)
Zo = 60π / { √εeff · [ K(k)/K(k′) + K(k1)/K(k1′) ] }
kv = 1/√εeff  λ/4 = kv · c / (4f)

K(k)/K(k′) uses Hilberg's approximation: π / ln[2(1+√k′)/(1−√k′)] for k ≤ 0.7, ln[2(1+√k)/(1−√k)] / π for k > 0.7.

Design tips

FAQ

GCPW or microstrip?
GCPW gives better isolation, lower radiation and crosstalk, suiting modules and dense layouts; microstrip width depends only on the dielectric height and is easy to control. Antenna feeds and RF modules commonly use GCPW.
Why is there no copper thickness input?
The model assumes zero-thickness conductors. Thickness adds gap capacitance and lowers the impedance slightly; for gaps below 0.15 mm leave a few ohms of margin or simulate.
How does it differ from CPW?
CPW has no backside ground plane; GCPW adds it, giving lower impedance and a more confined field. Pick the calculator that matches your stack-up.

Microstrip vs CPW vs GCPW vs coplanar strips

Pick the calculator that matches your board stack-up. The structures differ mainly in where the return (ground) conductor is:

Line typeConductors and groundTypical useCalculator
MicrostripTrace on the top layer over a solid ground plane on the other side of the dielectricGeneral RF routing and 50 Ω feeds on FR-4; easy to fabricate and tuneOpen Microstrip calculator
Coplanar waveguide (CPW)Signal trace between two ground planes on the same layer; no backside groundCeramic or single-sided boards, many shunt parts, GSG probe measurementsOpen Coplanar waveguide calculator
Grounded CPW (GCPW / CPWG)CPW plus a backside ground plane, top grounds stitched with viasRF modules, antenna feeds and dense layouts needing low radiation and crosstalkThis page
Coplanar strips (CPS)Two equal parallel strips, balanced, no ground planePrinted dipole and folded-dipole feeds, baluns, differential linesOpen Coplanar strips calculator

Related design tools

Designing an RF product? WENSHING supplies RF transceiver modules, LoRa modules, SMD ceramic antennas, directional antennas and UHF RFID readers, and supports custom RF circuit design.

Contact an engineer